Please, reread what you have posted in the article and stop bashing Mr. Kelchner for doing his job properly.

In the article you yourself point out that the panel had found her guilty and made recommendations for discipline and other actions.

I'm no lawyer, but that to me means no final decision had been made at that time, only a recommendation for an action, as was factually stated in Mr. Kelchner's letter.

As, he continues to state a final decision will be made within 10 days.

I applaud the Administration for taking the time to review the process and notes prior to committing to a final decision.

Once that decision is final, that is when the district is open for litigation.

I support Dallas ISD and feel that this type of unfair attack on a persons character who is only doing his job in the appropriate format is an outrage.

Stop trying to muddy the waters and create another scandal unnecessarily.

Please direct your efforts towards reporting accurately and factually what has happened instead of using your journalistic license to instigate more controversy.

We are asking that the district be held accountable and act responsibly.

I personally view Mr. Kelchners actions as being responsible. Recommendations are only that "a recommendation of the actions that may be taken".

What is done or decided after that point is what is considered actionable.

His letter states that no final decision had been made, the district was going to review the findings and/or recommendations, and act accordingly within 10 days.

No rash actions, good job DISD for taking the time to be responsible and review all the information before making the final decision. Errors do occur more often when there is a rush to judgment or action prior to reviewing all pertinent data.

[Ed Note: OK, we'll make this simple. I want you to click on this link. I want you to read the underlined word after "IN THE MATTER OF THE TERMINATION GRIEVANCE OF SHERRI BROKAW."

You may well be a fan of Kelchner, but he did not tell the truth. The only question remaining is: why?