Online Databases

Here's how to access them:

New! Per Diem Data


Sections

Contact Us

Create Content




User login

Get Firefox


d0 n0t 3mail u5 here


 

How DPD Can Get 45 Officers For Free!!! So, why aren't they doing it....

RecentCoin  2007-08-21 12:45     

Well, I did some poking around. MADD is getting $175 per DWI in Dallas [Ed Note: We received a letter from a MADD volunteer taking issue with this figure but we were unable to verify his claims (see comments below).].

There were approximately 10,000 DWI convictions in Dallas last year. That works out to $1,750,000.00. Now, keep in mind that Dallas is in the midst of a crime wave. If that money were funneled into the City's coffers, that would be enough to hire 45 more full time officers at the current starting pay. That's without raising taxes, selling bonds, or dipping into any other programs.

MADD has become a serious gravy train for a lot of people, paying their top ranking people $200,000 and up in salary. The received more than $3,000,000 from "forcing" (their word) people into their "VIP Panels" as part of their sentencing in 2004. I'm sure that those figures were more in 2005 and 2006. The numbers for 2007 are obviously not available yet.

Think about what the City could do if all the money that's going into other pockets were put back into the City. I'm also quite interested in knowing if these "charities" are contributing to the judges election campaigns. So much for a fair and impartial judicial system.

MADD Volunteer MAD At Us
Allen Gwinn  2008-01-06 10:06   

We received a letter from a MADD volunteer who called the comments on this thread "disgusting" and demanded that we run corrections and a public apology.

We politely declined.

With all due respect to those who have lost loved ones and friends to drunk drivers (of which I am part of that group), prosecutions for drunk driving would continue even if MADD were to cease existing today.

The writer took exception with the $175 figure quoted by our blogger. We're researching this, and will correct it if a correction is due. What the writer didn't take exception to was anything else in the article--the high salaries, the overall amount ($3M) it receives from governmental entities.

Another thing nobody (not even our letter writer) has ever attempted to explain is MADD's apparent disregard for guilt or innocence.

MADD was once a grassroots organization devoted to educating folks on the dangers of drunk driving. It appears to us that it hasn't been "all about that" for quite some time.

Perhaps some would find this article to contain a little more objective look at the MADD organization. Even Candy Lightner, MADD's founder, called the organization "overzealous."


MADD has long since lost its
Anonymous (not verified)  2007-12-18 15:14   

MADD has long since lost its way and been disowned by its original founders. Not only has it become a self-perpetuating bureaucracy unconcerned with guilt or innocence, it has morphed into a temperance organization.

They could care less whether someone is impaired while driving, their new goal appears to be to prohibit drinking entirely.


Why I'll Never Donate a Penny to MADD
Allen Gwinn  2007-10-30 05:24   

Removing drunks from behind the wheel is a noble cause.

That's not what MADD is about.

They are interested in publicity. Period. At all costs.

Regardless of guilt or innocence.

Several years ago, a friend of mine had just completed law school, and had lined up a career at the Dallas County D.A.'s office.

Late one night, this guy was stopped and arrested. Being of the mindset that someone should not have to prove their innocence (in this country, we prove "guilt") he refused a breathalizer.

However, during a taped interview (DWI suspects are usually videotaped for evidence), he was clearly not intoxicated. He clearly appeared sober, complying with police officers' instructions to move about and such.

When the prosecutor saw the tape, the case was dropped.

This incited MADD to go to the newspaper, never looking at the tape themselves, and accuse the Dallas County D.A. of "letting him off the hook" because he was a candidate for assistant D.A.

Obviously this ruined the career he'd worked through law school to get.

From that day, I've never donated a penny to MADD--and I've encouraged others to drop donations as well. They're not concerned with guilt-or-innocence, only with promoting their passion.

There: my 2-cents worth.


DWI and MADD
NewGuy (not verified)  2007-11-16 18:02   

With all due respect to your friend, that is one the downfalls of going into public office. Unfortunately, when you go into a job like that, there is no room for error.

While I am all for justice, I always wonder if people feel the same way about the construction worker or ditch digger, who could not afford a good attorney, and ends up losing his or her job/career over a situation like that.

Does that ditch digger mean less than a DA? I am not saying that you think that very thing, but I am always puzzled as to why there are no people screaming about the average guy that lost his whole way of life.

On the flip side, there was a Judge at Dallas County, who will remain nameless, who lost his career due to a DWI. He was one of the nicest guys I had ever met. He got drunk and had a wreck one night and lost his career. Funny thing was that everybody knew he was a drunk and they just laughed at it. I remember his face plastered all over the television. I felt so bad for him. Not because he was losing his career, but because he was all over TV just because of his position.

Going one step further, when a police officer is busted for DWI, his/her face is all over the television and they even dig into his/her job history. It becomes a dark day in law enforcement because a cop did something human.

Since I have gone that far, let me go off the deep end now. While in the military I saw plenty of young soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines lose their career for a DWI, but the high ranking officers who were caught...well lets just say it never went anywhere. I only know of one time that a commander was busted on DWI and it was because the Sgt, who stopped him, pushed the case until the police commander could not avoid letting the other commander fall.

Having said all of that, it is a cold fact that only one beer can put you over the limit. Depending on the person, one beer can knock them out for the count, while others may take quite a few more. Some people have the misconception that you have to be "drunk" to get a DWI. All that has to be shown is that you are impaired, which can be shown by a number of clues during the field sobriety test. I am sure that the intoxilyzer video tape may show him to not be in that bad of shape, but something gave the officers enough to arrest him. The bottom line is that you put your own life, career, and liberty in jeopardy anytime you drink and jump behind that wheel.

While I am sure your friend is a nice guy and had a great career started, he should have thought twice about getting into the vehicle.

[Ed Note: I appreciate your thoughts. With all due respect to construction workers and "ditch diggers," I don't have the stats on how many people MADD has screwed or backed off on. But this one experience showed me that MADD is not concerned with guilt or innocence--rather the charge against the person.

That's what my comments are about. And, based on that, I still say I'll never donate a penny to MADD and MADD's behavior was enough to get me to work on getting others follow suit!]


MADD, Drinking and Money
Anonymous (not verified)  2007-11-20 21:41   

Wow. Where to comment here.

I had no idea fines went to outside agencies. What law did that? Is MADD held accoutnable for that money --in that, what do they do with it in Dallas County?

High salaries for a 501(C)3 organization are not new. Again, do they have a public responsibility to show how they spend their money?

Finally, career enders are tragic, but not as tragic as life-enders. NewGuy's observations about DWI's in the military are exactly opposite to what I saw. In my time in service, it was the NCO's who would get busted a stripe, but got to stay in. The officers were told to resign their commissions.

Either way, the best lesson the military taught was: NO Drinking and Driving. Period. End of story. Get a cab, get a friend, walk home--or stay sober. If you have a drink in one hand a set of keys in the other, can you honestly gamble that you would drive JUST as safely as when you are stone cold sober?

[Ed Note: Point well made about driving after a drink, but everyone charged with criminal activity is entitled to his or her day in court. When a charge is dismissed and MADD runs to the newspapers and ruins the guy's career--that's rather low.

If there had been a conviction, that would have been one thing. But there wasn't.]


Can't Believe the Chief Responded
Anonymous (not verified)  2007-10-29 11:37   

I can't believe the Chief has responded, I think it is a great idea.

[Ed Note: Lots of public officials read Dallas.Org, though very few will admit it! With almost 60,000 to 90,000 readers a month, we reach lots of folks!]


 
Recent comments

Recent blog posts

DISD Videos

Click here to view videos from various DISD events


Popular content